Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
The Smith v. Goguen case is an excellent example of how unclear statements can be misinterpreted. I agree with the courts decision that the phrase treats contemptuously is unconstitutionally vague, as it does not fully address the standards of contemptuous treatment. Considering that the demonstration of contempt can vary significantly across individuals and can be presented differently based on the persons traits and behavior, legislation guidelines should justify which actions are to be considered contemptuous (Vile, 2018). In the lack of such descriptions, contemptuous behavior becomes challenging to define and prosecute, which leads to complications in enacting the relevant laws. As evident in the Smith v. Goguen case, the specific definitions behind contemptuous treatment were absent, and the prosecution mostly relied on the common meaning of this term (Vile, 2018). Nevertheless, in the judicial process, it is essential to rely on the established legislation rather than the proposed understandings, meaning that the utilized language was indeed constitutionally vague.
From this perspective, the necessity to justify the principles of the contemptuous act most significantly impacts the persecution of activities that could be considered as desecrating the integrity of the national symbols. Given that perception of contemptuous behavior depends on individual preferences and beliefs, various people could understand the contemptuous treatment idea differently, leading to numerous interpretations of the law (Hessick, 2016). However, to ensure just and equal law enforcement, the persecution should rely on distinct legislative guidelines, avoiding vague definitions and different understandings of the issue (Hessick, 2016). Considering that the language in the Massachusetts statute was unconstitutionally vague, this instance can prevent the emergence of similar situations which are based on the broad meaning of contemptuous treatment and not a specific definition.
References
Hessick, C. B. (2016). Vagueness principles. Arizona State Law Journal, 48.
Vile, J. R. (2018). The American flag: An encyclopedia of the stars and stripes in U.S. history, culture, and law. ABC-CLIO.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.